Cancer Research: What Are The Results So Far
The intransigent, self serving, close mindedness of some affiliates of organized medicine is being crushed by sharp realities fired by scientists from all parts the country.
It is becoming embarrassingly clear to the big “Cancer Research” organizations, that no matter how many guinea pig volunteers at U.S. penitentiaries they immunize with liver cancer cells, the subjects do not get cancer. No matter how much time is spent repeating this test and how much public fund is utilized in a benighted attempt to square a circle, the shine of the words, “There is no cancer in normal metabolism,” becomes brighter.
This viewpoint is no longer as controversial as it once was. Nowadays, a doctor from the Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation can inform the board of trustees of the Allergy Foundation that allergy is thought to be closely connected to the natural method of immunity, which include the body’s production of antibodies to combat invasion by germs, and that evidence of a lot of kinds has revealed that aspects in the body’s resistance are linked closely with the foundation and succeeding course of human cancer.
Theorists have recommended that cancer cells may develop from time to time in the typical body, but that most of these are adequately abnormal to be attacked effectively by the body’s natural defenses. Today, it is becoming more and more hard to reject the function of the liver in cancer, especially ever since the detection of the TIP – Tumour Inhibitory Principle – which is manufactured by this organ. The regular liver manufactures a chemical factor that powerfully inhibits growth of experimental cancer in mice. The part is imparted both to the blood serum as well as to the bile and has not been found in cancer patients.
The proof implies the hypothesis that shortage, either hereditary or acquired, of such inhibitory factors might be fundamental to the cause of cancer.
